ArticleScientific reports2026
Secure authentication using a multidimensional retinal biometric encryption method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biometric encryption integrates physiological traits with cryptographic operations to improve authentication security. Retinal vasculature is particularly attractive due to its internal protection, permanence, and high inter-subject variability. we present a revised and rigorously justified multidimensional retinal encryption framework that generates three independent keys—RDDM (Retinal Diagonal Distance Metric), ROTD (Radial Origin-Terminus Distance), and DRID (Diagonal–Radial Intersection Distance)—from a single retinal vessel map. This framework is intended as a biometric-driven key generation and strengthening module to enhance user authentication, rather than a standalone standard encryption algorithm. It operates under a threat model focused on resisting brute-force key guessing in controlled biometric contexts, but not advanced attacks like quantum cryptanalysis or side-channel exploitation. Retinal images undergo preprocessing (CLAHE, vessel segmentation, skeletonization, endpoint detection) to extract stable endpoints. These endpoints produce distance measures that are normalized and combined into polyalphabetic key streams. We provide stepwise derivations of the encryption E(x) and decryption D(y) equations, explicitly justify mod 124 as the symbol table size used in implementation, and include a detailed cryptanalytic evaluation (entropy, NIST SP800-22 randomness tests, Hamming distance, collision analysis, noise sensitivity, and Full-Space Key Guessing (FSKG) calculations). Experimental results on three retinal samples (n_vessels = 27,41,105) show substantially increased FSKG times and near-maximal key entropy relative to single-key baselines. Limitations and sensitivity to image quality are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.