Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41839949›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Inverse multi-principal element alloys design via conditional wasserstein generative adversarial network.

Cephas Acquah Forson, Ehsan Gerashi, Yuming Zhao, Armin Hatefi, Sima A Alidokht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cephas Acquah ForsonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Ehsan GerashiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Yuming ZhaoDepartment of Chemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Armin HatefiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Sima A AlidokhtDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada. saalidokht@mun.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of multi-principal element alloys (MPEAs) is challenged by data scarcity and the complexity of optimizing multiple mechanical properties simultaneously. To address these challenges, we investigate an inverse material design approach that integrates experimental data with machine learning using generative adversarial networks. A conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial network (cWGAN) is developed and compared to a baseline conditional GAN (cGAN). Both models are designed to generate alloy compositions conditioned on hardness and elastic modulus. The proposed cWGAN framework demonstrates superior performance, achieving more stable training dynamics, closer alignment with experimental distributions, and more accurate reproduction of elemental correlations compared with the cGAN model. Furthermore, compositions generated by cWGAN improve the performance of downstream predictive models, confirming their quality and utility for high-throughput evaluation and discovery of novel MEPAs with targeted properties. Collectively, these results demonstrate the advantages of the cWGAN architecture under data-limited conditions and establish it as a practically useful framework for accelerating the design of MPEAs with enhanced mechanical performance.

Indexed as

Elastic modulusHardnessInverse material designMechanical propertiesMulti-principal element alloys

Identifiers

PMID41839949
PMCPMC13125224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.