ArticleScientific reports2026
Energy absorption and rebound behavior of 3D-printed TPU lattice structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) often encounter complex ground conditions during takeoff and landing, especially on unpaved surfaces such as snow, sand, grass, and slopes, as well as under extreme conditions like strong winds and dense fog. In these scenarios, the landing gear may experience significant impact loads and vibrations. If the structure fails to absorb energy effectively and rebound promptly, it may compromise airframe stability, onboard system reliability, and operational safety. To optimize the energy absorption–rebound performance of UAV landing gear, this study employed thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU 98 A) to design five homogeneous and gradient lattice structures with varying cell parameters, fabricated via fused deposition modeling (FDM). Quasi-static compression tests were conducted to investigate load–displacement behavior, energy absorption, and rebound performance. A multidimensional evaluation system was established based on total energy absorption (EA), specific energy absorption (SEA), hysteresis loop area (HLA), energy recovery ratio (ERR), residual displacement ratio (RDR), and stiffness degradation ratio (SDR), enabling an integrated assessment of energy absorption and rebound. Results demonstrate that TPU lattice structures achieve high energy absorption while maintaining excellent rebound performance and structural stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.