ArticleScientific reports2026
Boundary sensitive-net-based lumbar vertebra segmentation and spondylolisthesis measurement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lumbar spine disorders represent a significant public health concern, with accurate diagnosis relying on vertebral segmentation and quantification. Traditional methods, such as Cobb angle measurement are constrained by two-dimensional projections, while cumulative segmentation and quantification errors limit automated CT analysis. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes a deep learning-based Boundary-Sensitive Network (BS-Net), integrating a Multi-Task Edge Processing (MEP) module and Contextual Bilateral Fusion (CBF) module to enhance vertebral edge feature extraction. The framework combines edge loss functions with morphological post-processing to achieve joint segmentation and quantification. Evaluations on 783 lumbar CT images from 379 patients and the public SPIDER MRI dataset demonstrate that BS-Net surpasses baseline models, achieving an MIoU of 96.56% and a Dice coefficient of 98.5%. Its spondylolisthesis quantification also shows strong agreement with manual assessment (ICC> 0.9). These results indicate that BS-Net provides an efficient and accurate solution for automated diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis, with substantial clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.