ArticleScientific data2026
Eye movement benchmark data for smooth-pursuit classification.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eye movement benchmark data for smooth-pursuit classification.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of eye tracking data often requires accurate classification of eye movement events. Human experts and classification algorithms often confuse episodes of fixations (fixating stationary targets) and smooth pursuits (fixating moving targets) because their feature characteristics overlap. To foster the development of better classification algorithms, we created a benchmark data set that does not rely on human annotation as the gold standard. It consists of almost four hours of eye movements. Ten participants fixated different targets designed to induce saccades, fixations, and smooth pursuits. Plausible benchmark labels were established by designing stimuli that prevent fixations and smooth pursuits to co-occur, and separating them from saccades by their velocity. Here we make available both the raw data and offer a convenient way for preprocessing and assigning plausible benchmark labels in the form of a companion package in Python. We encourage researchers to utilize them for feature engineering, and to train, validate, and benchmark their algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.