ArticleNature communications2026
Bridging the latency gap with a continuous stream evaluation framework in event-driven perception.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromorphic vision systems process continuous event streams and offer transformative potential for real-time applications. However, their evaluation remains tethered to methodologies from RGB imaging. These approaches convert asynchronous event streams into synchronized frames and ignore perception latency, creating a critical gap between benchmarks and real-world performance. To address this, we introduce the STream-based lAtency-awaRe Evaluation (STARE) framework. STARE integrates two core components: Continuous Sampling, maximizing model throughput to reduce the impact of latency, and Latency-Aware Evaluation, quantifying latency-induced online accuracy. To rigorously validate STARE, we developed ESOT500, a high-dynamic object tracking dataset with 500 Hz annotations. Experiments reveal that latency severely degrades online accuracy by over 50%. We further introduce two model enhancement strategies: Asynchronous Tracking, a fast-slow architecture that boosts model throughput, and Context-Aware Sampling, which dynamically adapts input to handle low event density cases. Overall, our work bridges the latency gap between models' theoretical potential and real-world deployment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.