Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41839728›Full record

ArticleDyslexia (Chichester, England)2026

Random Number Generation in Adults With Dyslexia: Further Evidence of Dyslexia-Related Executive Function Difficulties.

Emmanuella Joy Osofisan, Elisa Carrus, James H Smith-Spark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emmanuella Joy OsofisanLondon South Bank University, London, UK.
Elisa CarrusLondon South Bank University, London, UK.
James H Smith-SparkLondon South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-0547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that people with dyslexia have executive function deficits. The current study used a random generation task as a novel way to investigate executive function in adults with dyslexia. Participants (total N = 54) were asked to produce an unpredictable sequence of 100 digits verbally. Over the course of the task, the dyslexia group's performance improved gradually, while the control group's performance remained stable. An analysis by 25-digit quartiles showed that the group with dyslexia performed better in the middle to end of the task when compared with their performance earlier in the task. This result suggests that the dyslexia group initially struggled with the executive demands due to task novelty and difficulties with instantiating appropriate strategies. Over time, the group with dyslexia improved and performed better than the group without dyslexia by the end of the task. These initial difficulties are suggestive of dyslexia-related Supervisory Attentional System (SAS) dysfunction, with the SAS in dyslexia progressively operating more smoothly in its continuous monitoring and control of responses. As well as contributing to theoretical discussions about the role of executive function in dyslexia, the results have implications for supporting people with dyslexia when encountering new tasks.

Indexed as

DyslexiaExecutive FunctionAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adultadultsdevelopmental dyslexiaexecutive functionrandom number generationstrategy selectionsupervisory attentional system

Identifiers

PMID41839728
PMCPMC12991964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.