ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Early effectiveness and safety of mini open endoscopy assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the early effectiveness and safety of mini open endoscopy assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (MOEA-ACDF) versus traditional ACDF in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 60 patients with CSM admitted between January 2022 and January 2023 who met the selection criteria, including 30 cases each undergoing MOEA-ACDF and traditional ACDF. Except for age and height of the adjacent vertebral body (HAVB), no significant difference was observed between groups ( Results: Both groups completed the operations successfully. The MOEA-ACDF group exhibited significantly longer operation time compared to the ACDF group ( Conclusion: MOEA-ACDF has good early effectiveness in the treatment of CSM, and can effectively improve the height and physiological curvature of cervical spine, which is equivalent to the traditional ACDF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.