ArticleBMJ global health2026
Healthcare utilisation among migrants in the Netherlands' unique hybrid healthcare system: the HELIUS study.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigrants in Europe often face barriers to healthcare, contributing to poorer health outcomes. While healthcare utilisation has been studied within Beveridge systems (eg, the UK) and Bismarck systems (eg, Germany), less is known about healthcare use by migrants within the Netherlands' hybrid model. The Dutch model combines a Bismarckian base with Beveridge-like supplements. We investigated the use of general practitioner (GP) services, specialist care, allied health services and complementary medicine among major migrant groups in Amsterdam (South Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish and Moroccan origin) compared with the Dutch-origin population.
methodsWe used pre-pandemic Healthy Life in an Urban Setting data (2015; n=21 614) to avoid biases from intra-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 healthcare disruptions/alterations. Structured questionnaires assessed healthcare use and reasons for seeking care. Poisson regression with a log link and robust (sandwich) standard errors examined associations between migration background and healthcare utilisation, adjusting for demographics, acculturation, health literacy, lifestyle and chronic conditions. Sensitivity analyses explored motivations for care use and overall health status.
resultsAll migrant groups reported higher or similar use of GP services compared with the Dutch-origin population. Most migrant groups (except Ghanaians) also reported higher or similar use of specialist and allied health services. Conversely, use of complementary medicine was higher among Dutch-origin participants than among migrants.
conclusionMany migrant groups in Amsterdam show higher use of mainstream healthcare services compared with previous reports from other European settings. Further studies should examine and dissect these patterns to inform improvements in other European settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.