Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41839492›Full record

ReviewOpen heart2026

Value of cinematic rendering in cardiac and vascular imaging.

Amy Avakian, Muhammad Umair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amy AvakianSouthern Hills Hospital & Medical Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA amyavakian1@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0007-1387-9703
Muhammad UmairJohns Hopkins University Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-8335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cinematic rendering (CR) is a three-dimensional visualisation technique that applies physically based lighting to standard volumetric CT and MRI datasets, producing images with enhanced depth and spatial realism. Although often regarded as primarily aesthetic, we believe CR offers practical clinical value in selected cardiac and vascular imaging scenarios. It can provide continuity of volumetric visualisation of structures leading to improved understanding of complex anatomy, enhance multidisciplinary communication, for example, in multidisciplinary conferences, and support procedural planning. This viewpoint discusses where CR adds meaningful insight into cardiovascular care and argues that its potential remains underused. Rather than replacing conventional imaging techniques, CR should be viewed as a complementary tool that enhances interpretation when spatial relationships are critical. As cardiovascular imaging becomes increasingly central to complex interventions and team-based decision-making, CR may play an important supporting role.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineHumansPredictive Value of TestsCardiac Imaging TechniquesComputed Tomography AngiographyDiagnostic Imaging

Identifiers

PMID41839492
PMCPMC12993358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.