Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2026
Development and evaluation of a digital single-session reappraisal intervention to shift negative self-focused social media interpretations.
Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social media is fraught with ambiguity and opportunities for making skewed interpretations. Negative interpretation bias, or the tendency to assign negative meanings in response to ambiguous information, is associated with mental health problems like depression and anxiety, while positive interpretation bias, or the tendency to make positive interpretations in response to ambiguity, may be protective. Interpretation bias is a modifiable treatment target in cognitive interventions. Reappraisal, which involves considering different perspectives, may hold promise for shifting negative self-focused social media interpretations (i.e., "online" interpretation bias, such as catastrophic thoughts about the significance of not having enough likes or followers). Through a multiphase user-centered design process with college student stakeholders (N = 37), we developed a digital single-session reappraisal intervention to shift online interpretation bias, as well as secondary outcomes (e.g., "offline" interpretation bias, reflecting interpretations about situations that are not online, like in-person parties). A randomized-controlled trial with N = 162 college students who reported negative self-evaluations tied to social media was conducted to compare PRISM to an activity-matched social media control condition. As hypothesized, PRISM led to greater reductions in online and offline negative interpretation bias and increases in online and offline positive interpretation bias than the control condition, post-intervention and at two-week follow-up. However, PRISM was largely ineffective in shifting outcomes other than interpretation bias (e.g., anxiety and depressive symptoms), underscoring the need to enhance transfer of the interpretation bias changes to improve other clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.