Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41839456›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Structural characteristics mediate forest mitigation potential against climate change and biodiversity loss.

Julian Lunow, Sabina Burrascano, Lorenzo Balducci, Francesco Chianucci, Lucas Chojnacki, Inken Doerfler, Jeňýk Hofmeister, Jan Hošek, Péter Ódor, Peter Schall and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structural characteristics mediate forest mitigation potential against climate change and biodiversity loss.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julian LunowBiocenter, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Applied Biodiversity Science, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2762-2507
Sabina BurrascanoDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6537-3313
Lorenzo BalducciDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9111-5679
Francesco ChianucciCREA, Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, Arezzo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5688-2060
Lucas ChojnackiForest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-1208
Inken DoerflerDepartment of Plant Sociology and Nature Conservation, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9624-1922
Jeňýk HofmeisterFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3915-5056
Jan HošekEcological Services, Hořovice, Czech Republic.
Péter ÓdorCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-8897
Peter SchallSilviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-818X
Tommaso SitziaDepartment Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-4256
Nadja K SimonsBiocenter, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Applied Biodiversity Science, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-7050

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG Priority Program 1374EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 through the COST Association CA18207Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Regional Identity by decision of the German Bundestag 2220NR244A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

European forests play an important role for climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation. As they have been shaped by silviculture for centuries, it is important to understand how management practices affect forest structure and in turn influence the role of forests in achieving both goals. We analyzed data on a wide range of temperate European forests encompassing the most widespread management regimes to understand the interplay of forest structure, aboveground carbon stocks, and the richness of several taxonomic groups. Using structural equation modeling, we identified the forest structural characteristics that are positively correlated with both carbon stocks and species richness. We found that stand age and tree species richness are related to other forest structural characteristics, which had positive links to carbon stocks in deadwood. Increasing stand age was associated with an increase in deadwood carbon stocks. There were no direct negative relationships between stand age or tree species richness and the richness of different taxonomic groups. An increasing richness of deadwood types had positive links with the species richness of birds, saproxylic beetles, and saproxylic fungi, as with deadwood carbon stocks. However, increases in the species richness of birds and understory vascular plants were negatively related to increasing carbon stocks in living wood, while beetle species richness was positively related to this carbon stock. Birds' species richness was directly and positively associated with increasing mean tree diameter. Conversely, a higher richness of tree species was indirectly linked to lower carbon stocks in living wood. Additionally, an increase in mean tree diameter was indirectly correlated with a decrease in bird and vascular plant species richness. Our findings highlight potential trade-offs between carbon stocks in living wood and the species richness of several taxonomic groups in European forests, while the species richness of some taxonomic groups was positively correlated to deadwood carbon stocks. Policies focused on increasing living biomass may not target both the climate and biodiversity crises. Instead, the diversity of deadwood emerges as a key factor in explaining the relationship between carbon storage and biodiversity, and should hence play a prominent role in forest management strategies and related policies.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesForestryForestsTreesAnimalsEuropebiodiversity conservationcarbon storageclimate changedeadwood qualityforest managementmulti‐taxon

Identifiers

PMID41839456
PMCPMC12991856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.