ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
[Current primary care management of patients with hyperkalemia in Germany - Findings on monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of elevated potassium levels].
Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic diseases are at increased risk of hyperkalemia, particularly when treated with RAASi. However, data on the management of hyperkalemia in German primary care practices are limited. Methods: The retrospective, cross-sectional study WATCH-K included 411202 patients from primary care practices with documented chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF), hypertension, and/or diabetes mellitus, all at elevated risk for hyperkalemia. Patients were observed for ≥1 year. The study analyzed the frequency of serum potassium measurements, the prevalence and diagnosis of hyperkalemia, and its treatment with potassium binders. Results: In the overall population 70.8% of patients received RAASi therapy, and 35.2% had their serum potassium levels measured at least once during the year, most frequently among patients with CKD (44.8%) and HF (42.8%). Among all patients tested, 24.5% (n=35368) showed hyperkalemic values, but only 2.0% (n=696) had a recorded diagnosis. Only 10.9% (n=76) of them were treated with potassium binders, and only 15.8% (n=12) of them received modern agents such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate or patiromer. Conclusion: The management of hyperkalemia in high-risk patients in German primary care should be significantly improved through more frequent potassium monitoring and guideline-directed use of potassium binders to enhance patient outcomes. Furthermore, exploring the reasons behind the cautious use of medication to treat hyperkalemia may provide valuable insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.