ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Machine Learning Prediction of Progression to Dialysis in Patients With Polycystic Kidney Disease: Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), characterized by progressive cyst growth and renal decline, is the leading genetic cause of end-stage renal disease. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of progression to dialysis in patients with ADPKD using a nationwide administrative database. Early identification of high-risk patients is critical for timely monitoring. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (2007-2018) to identify newly diagnosed patients with ADPKD. Six ML algorithms, including logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were employed to predict progression to dialysis. Models were developed using 10-fold cross-validation, with the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique applied within training folds to address class imbalance. An ensemble-based feature selection strategy was implemented to identify the most robust predictors and optimize final model performance. Model evaluation was conducted using a strict temporal split. Results: The study included 1856 patients with ADPKD, of whom 302 (16.27%) progressed to dialysis. Multivariable Cox regression identified several significant risk factors, including age 66 years and older (hazard ratio [HR] 4.63, 95% CI 2.71-7.92; P<.001), anemia (HR 4.33, 95% CI 3.25-5.78; P<.001), congestive heart failure (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.29-2.54; P<.001), and acute kidney injury (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.41; P=.003). Among the ML models, the XGBoost model, using an optimized set of 27 features, demonstrated the highest predictive performance on the held-out temporal test set (accuracy 98.3%; area under the curve 0.955; F1-score 0.800; Brier score 0.022). The top predictors in the XGBoost model largely aligned with age, comorbidity burden, anemia, and cardiovascular disease markers. Medication use (eg, anticoagulants, loop diuretics, febuxostat) was also among the most influential predictors; however, medication-related predictors should be interpreted as proxies for disease complexity rather than direct risk modulators. Conclusions: ML models can predict dialysis risk in patients with ADPKD using administrative data with temporal validation. This approach may support risk stratification by helping identify individuals at higher predicted risk who may warrant closer monitoring and further specialist evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.