Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838873›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Sensitive detection of copy number alterations in low-pass liquid biopsy sequencing data.

Lotta Eriksson, Eszter Lakatos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lotta ErikssonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmers Tvärgata 3, 412 58 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-4847-3660
Eszter LakatosDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmers Tvärgata 3, 412 58 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7221-6850

Funding

Chalmers Area of Advance Health Engineering AoAH2022Gender Initiative for ExcellenceSwedish Research Council VR2024-04145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsies, coupled with analysis of copy number alterations (CNAs), have emerged as a promising tool for non-invasive monitoring of cancer progression and tumor composition. However, methods utilizing CNA data from liquid biopsies are limited by the low signal in the samples, caused by a low percentage of cancer DNA in the blood, and inherent noise introduced in the sequencing. To address this challenge, we developed BayesCNA, a method designed to improve signal extraction from low-pass liquid biopsy sequencing data, by utilizing a Bayesian changepoint detection algorithm. We use information of the posterior changepoint probabilities to identify likely changepoints, where a changepoint indicates a shift in the copy number state. The signal is then reconstructed using the identified partition. We show the effectiveness of the method on synthetically generated datasets and compare the method with state-of-the-art bioinformatics tools under noisy conditions. Our results show that this novel approach increases sensitivity in detecting CNAs, particularly in low-quality cases.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyBayesian changepoint detectioncopy number alterationsliquid biopsieslow-pass sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41838873
PMCPMC12991053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.