Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838802›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Approximate Bayesian inference of directed acyclic graphs in biology with flexible priors on edge states.

Evan A Martin, Venkata Patchigolla, Audrey Qiuyan Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Evan A MartinThe Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
Venkata PatchigollaThe MD-PhD Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
Audrey Qiuyan FuDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Institute for AI and Data Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3479-5652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphical models are widely used to represent dependence structures in biological systems, where directed edges may encode causal relationships under appropriate assumptions. We present baycn (BAYesian Causal Network), a novel approximate Bayesian method for inferring probabilities of edge directions and edge absence, while allowing flexible, user-specified priors to encode sparsity and an input graph to incorporate biological knowledge. For inference, we develop a Metropolis-Hastings-like sampler over graph structures based on a pseudo-posterior with a plug-in likelihood, which eliminates potentially high-dimensional nuisance parameters. This formulation substantially improves computational efficiency while yielding posterior probabilities that reflect Markov equivalence. We apply baycn to two genomic applications: distinguishing direct from indirect target genes of a shared genetic variant, and inferring combinatorial binding of transcription factors during tissue differentiation in Drosophila embryos. Both applications involve discrete and continuous data types that are common in genomics. Selected variables in these applications are treated as instrumental variables to help impose constraints on edge direction. Baycn demonstrates substantially improved accuracy at both the graph and edge levels, while existing methods do not handle mixed data, fail to capture weak signals, or are computationally infeasible.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDrosophilaGenomicsMarkov Chains

Identifiers

PMID41838802
PMCPMC13046286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.