Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838781›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Accurate prediction of flux distributions compatible with metabolite concentration effects in genome-scale metabolic networks.

Fayaz Soleymani, Zahra Razaghi-Moghadam, Zoran Nikoloski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fayaz SoleymaniSystems Biology and Mathematical Modeling Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5183-7407
Zahra Razaghi-MoghadamBioinformatics Department, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Zoran NikoloskiSystems Biology and Mathematical Modeling Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-6763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular fluxes shape all cellular functions, and understanding how they are shaped by the joint effects of enzyme abundances and metabolite concentrations in vivo currently requires gathering matched quantitative proteomic and metabolomic data sets from resource-intensive experiments. Here, we present KineFlux, a hybrid approach that combines machine learning with enzyme-constrained metabolic models to accurately predict steady-state flux distributions using only quantitative proteomic data. KineFlux builds machine learning models for metabolite concentration effects on reaction fluxes, obtained by using fluxomics and proteomics data from a training set of experiments. Using fluxomic and proteomic data sets of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we show that the steady-state flux distributions predicted by KineFlux are in line with fluxes estimated by classical approaches. We also demonstrate that the machine learning models embedded in KineFlux are transferrable at marginal loss of accuracy using independent testing data from E. coli. Therefore, KineFlux expands the usability of enzyme-constrained models towards accurate prediction of genome-scale flux distributions compatible with metabolite concentration effects without knowledge of enzyme kinetics.

Indexed as

Metabolic Flux AnalysisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalComputational BiologyEscherichia coliMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID41838781
PMCPMC13008253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.