Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838773›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

singIST: An integrative method for comparative single-cell transcriptomics between disease models and humans.

Aitor Moruno-Cuenca, Sergio Picart-Armada, Rachael Bogle, Jennifer Fox, Lam C Tsoi, Johann Eli Gudjonsson, Alexandre Perera-Lluna, Francesc Fernández-Albert

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aitor Moruno-CuencaData Science, R&D Center, Almirall SA, Sant Feliu de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8133-2552
Sergio Picart-ArmadaData Science, R&D Center, Almirall SA, Sant Feliu de Llobregat, Spain.
Rachael BogleDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Jennifer FoxDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6783-8742
Lam C TsoiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Johann Eli GudjonssonDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Alexandre Perera-LlunaB2SLab, Institut de Recerca i Innovació en Salut (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc Fernández-AlbertData Science, R&D Center, Almirall SA, Sant Feliu de Llobregat, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationDisease models are fundamental tools in drug discovery and early-stage drug development, but they only approximate human disease, and selecting a suitable model is challenging. Quantitative computational methods exist to assess molecular resemblance to human conditions, but approaching that work at single-cell resolution, and doing so in an explainable and generalizable way, remain very limited.

resultsWe present singIST, a computational method for comparative single-cell transcriptomics analysis between disease models and human conditions. singIST provides explainable quantitative measures on disease model similarity to the human reference at the pathway, cell type and gene levels. These measures jointly account for gene orthology, cell type presence in the model, cell type and gene importance in the human condition, and gene level fold changes in the model, within a unifying framework that controls for the intrinsic complexities of single-cell data. We first test singIST in three well-characterized murine models against moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis, showing that it recapitulates established biology while generating new hypotheses. We then apply it to Hidradenitis Suppurativa, comparing in vivo human lesions with ex vivo skin explants with and without CD3/CD28 stimulation, and show that stimulation selectively improves pathways that already recapitulate the human signal. Finally, we perform simulation studies that: (i) unit-test the implementation and behaviour of the algorithm under controlled scenarios and (ii) compare singIST against a naïve baseline based on overlapping differentially expressed genes.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsDermatitis, AtopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41838773
PMCPMC13008255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.