ArticlePloS one2026
Policy Modeling Consistency index-based study on policy synergy for sustainable artificial intelligence in China's digital cultural industries.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper applies the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model to quantitatively evaluate 32 Chinese policies (2016-2025) promoting artificial intelligence (AI) in digital cultural industries (DCIs). Focusing on policy synergy for sustainable AI, the analysis assesses ten primary variables-including policy objectives, instruments, sustainability integration, and application levels-across national and local initiatives. Results reveal an overall 'Excellent' average PMC score, indicating robust policy design in economic or technological domains. However, some low-grade policies prioritize short-term regulation over sustainable governance. The study recommends embedding 'human-centricity' and 'ethical risk assessment' in sustainability indicators, alongside cultural diversity safeguards (e.g., algorithmic support for intangible heritage). These optimizations can reframe AI as a socio-cultural enabler-not merely a technical tool-advancing equitable, innovative, and ecologically resilient DCIs aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.