ArticlePloS one2026
Non-linear impacts of local fiscal expenditure on farmers' income: A SHAP-informed machine-learning analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how local fiscal spending shapes rural income is central to China's rural revitalisation strategy. Using panel data from 17 prefecture-level cities in Henan Province for 2010-2023, this study investigates the non-linear and heterogeneous effects of fiscal expenditure on farmers' per-capita income. A hybrid econometric-machine learning framework is developed, combining city-year fixed effects with a residual XGBoost learner and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to capture both the linear baseline relationships and complex non-linear interactions among fiscal items while retaining interpretability. Model evaluation based on repeated nested cross-validation and 500 permutation tests demonstrates high predictive reliability (out-of-sample R2 = 0.924, p = 0.002). SHAP-based analysis reveals that healthcare and education spending are the dominant determinants of rural income, jointly accounting for over 40% of model influence. Partial-dependence plots uncover clear threshold effects: education and health expenditures exhibit inverted-U shapes with turning points at approximately ¥1,800 and ¥1,050 per rural resident (2015 prices), respectively. Infrastructure investment shows consistently positive but diminishing returns, while social-security transfers produce concave yet non-negative effects. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that low-capacity cities derive greater benefits from technology and transport spending, whereas high-capacity cities gain more from health and urbanisation budgets. Robustness tests across alternative learners (Random Forest, LightGBM) and variable definitions confirm the stability of these non-linear thresholds. The results highlight the importance of optimising fiscal composition rather than merely increasing total spending, suggesting that city-specific expenditure ceilings-particularly for education and health-could raise rural incomes by 2-3% while enhancing fiscal efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.