ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Bayesian-calibrated global sensitivity analysis for mathematical models using generative AI.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a generative modeling framework for global sensitivity analysis (GSA) in complex systems characterized by strong and potentially high-dimensional parameter correlations. Traditional variance-based GSA methods rely on the assumption of independent inputs, which rarely holds for Bayesian-calibrated models. While recent extensions using Rosenblatt transformations and Shapley effects theoretically address this limitation, their implementation requires accurate conditional sampling from correlated joint distributions, a task that remains challenging. Existing solutions suffer from restrictive assumptions on input dependence, which limit their applicability to complex data-driven problems. Our method addresses these challenges by reframing sensitivity analysis as a post calibration task on Bayesian posterior distributions, where parameter correlations are learned from data using generative models, eliminating restrictive dependence assumptions and ensuring data relevant sensitivity estimates. We employ autoregressive architectures to implement Rosenblatt transformations and leverage diffusion models to estimate Shapley effects. These methods impose no predefined distributional assumptions and scale efficiently with both data volume and model complexity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on two representative applications: a COVID-19 transmission model and a cancer immunotherapy model. Results show that our methods effectively captures parameter sensitivities in the presence of parameter correlations, and achieve notable gains in scalability and flexibility over existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.