Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838759›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Bayesian-calibrated global sensitivity analysis for mathematical models using generative AI.

Xuyuan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xuyuan WangDepartment of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-4470-8200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a generative modeling framework for global sensitivity analysis (GSA) in complex systems characterized by strong and potentially high-dimensional parameter correlations. Traditional variance-based GSA methods rely on the assumption of independent inputs, which rarely holds for Bayesian-calibrated models. While recent extensions using Rosenblatt transformations and Shapley effects theoretically address this limitation, their implementation requires accurate conditional sampling from correlated joint distributions, a task that remains challenging. Existing solutions suffer from restrictive assumptions on input dependence, which limit their applicability to complex data-driven problems. Our method addresses these challenges by reframing sensitivity analysis as a post calibration task on Bayesian posterior distributions, where parameter correlations are learned from data using generative models, eliminating restrictive dependence assumptions and ensuring data relevant sensitivity estimates. We employ autoregressive architectures to implement Rosenblatt transformations and leverage diffusion models to estimate Shapley effects. These methods impose no predefined distributional assumptions and scale efficiently with both data volume and model complexity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on two representative applications: a COVID-19 transmission model and a cancer immunotherapy model. Results show that our methods effectively captures parameter sensitivities in the presence of parameter correlations, and achieve notable gains in scalability and flexibility over existing methods.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremCalibrationComputational BiologyCOVID-19Generative Artificial IntelligenceHumansNeoplasmsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41838759
PMCPMC13004599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.