ArticlePLOS global public health2026
The perceived impacts of United States foreign development assistance reductions on health system building blocks at healthcare facilities in Zambia: A mixed-methods study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- U.S. Public Health Policy Shifts Under the Second Trump Administration and Implications for the Republic of Korea's Health Security.Public health weekly report · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid reduction in foreign development assistance from the United States and other countries in 2025 has disrupted essential global health programming. Countries that previously received development assistance, such as Zambia, may experience weakening of health system capacity due to program cancellations. This study aimed to describe the perceived impacts of USAID program defunding on healthcare delivery in Zambia. We conducted a cross-sectional survey at 34 purposively selected healthcare facilities in three districts of Zambia in April and May 2025. Through facility-level assessments and individual-level surveys with 330 healthcare workers, we identified changes in health system building blocks that may have arisen from program defunding. The facility-level assessment found that 71% of healthcare facilities (n = 24) experienced changes related to funding cuts within the previous three to four months. In open-ended surveys, healthcare workers reported impacts on the health system, including stock-outs of essential medicines, diagnostic tests, and infection control supplies; layoffs of US-supported healthcare workers; and reduced ability to work with electronic medical records. Workers described how these changes affected workplace morale, patient satisfaction, and their ability to deliver essential services. This study reveals the immediate consequences of defunding foreign assistance, which, if left unaddressed, may weaken health systems and worsen health outcomes. National governments and partner organizations should prioritize interventions and investments that build health system resilience, such as expanding healthcare revenue streams and improving workforce capacity. In the wake of funding cuts, health system strengthening can reduce reliance on foreign assistance and improve population health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.