Observational studyPloS one2026
Health care system resilience - Evaluating the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency medical service demand in Germany: A case study from the city of Jena.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted health systems globally, including emergency medical services (EMS). This study evaluates the absorptive and adaptive resilience of EMS in Jena, Germany, by analysing how the system managed significant pandemic-induced shocks to demand and operational workflows.
methodsWe conducted an observational, retrospective analysis of EMS missions in Jena from January 2018 to December 2021. Data on mission volumes, patient demographics, health issues, and dispatch and treatment intervals were analysed. Lockdown periods were compared to corresponding pre-pandemic reference periods to determine significant differences.
resultsDuring first and second lockdown EMS mission volume decreased by 16% and 10% respectively, when comparing with reference periods. Patient age increased, with a mean age of 62.2 years during the first lockdown versus 58.9 years in the reference period. There was a notable rise in on-site treatments without hospital transport. Cardiovascular cases decreased during lockdown periods, while occurrence of psychiatric patients increased. Scene times and handover times extended significantly, contributing to longer total mission times.
conclusionsThe pandemic led to shift in demand patterns, characterized by reduced overall demand, extended mission times, and a change in treatment focus from cardiovascular to psychiatric and psychosocial issues, reflecting changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour and operational challenges. While regional studies have examined mission volumes, our study provides a higher-resolution analysis of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pre-clinical EMS in Germany and provides important insights to be used for health care planning and policy decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.