ArticlePloS one2026
Experiences of people living with HIV who have participated in psychological interventions: Protocol for a qualitative meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMental health problems among people living with HIV have been widely documented, including a high burden of common mental disorders. Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of various psychological interventions, there is limited understanding of how these interventions are experienced and evaluated by participants themselves. A key factor in ensuring successful implementation lies in how individuals interpret and emotionally respond to an intervention-specifically, whether they perceive it as meaningful, appropriate, and aligned with their expectations and needs. This qualitative meta-analysis aims to explore the subjective therapeutic experiences of people living with HIV who have participated in psychological interventions, with a particular focus on their acceptability and the perceived impact on psychological well-being. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A qualitative meta-analysis will be conducted following the descriptive-interpretive approach, which enables the identification and synthesis of meaning units from participants' narratives. The review will include qualitative and mixed-methods studies, with a clearly distinguishable qualitative component, published between January 1, 2000 and February 23, 2026, focusing on the therapeutic experiences of people living with HIV who have received psychological interventions for common mental health problems. A comprehensive search will be performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO and SciELO. Methodological quality will be assessed using the CASP tool, and confidence in the findings will be evaluated through GRADE-CERQual. The data analysis will follow the descriptive-interpretive meta-analysis approach. Data management and thematic analysis will be supported by Microsoft Excel, Rayyan and/or ATLAS.ti. EXPECTED
resultsThis review is expected to identify key experiential themes that reflect how people living with HIV perceive and evaluate psychological interventions, including the aspects they find most helpful, challenging, or relevant. Findings will contribute to a better understanding of the acceptability of such interventions and offer practical insights for improving their design, delivery, and contextual adaptation. DISSEMINATION: The results of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at scientific conferences related to mental health, HIV, and qualitative research. The findings are expected to inform the development of more acceptable and culturally sensitive psychological interventions for people living with HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.