ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
A prospective cohort study to describe the morphology of buboes in patients with bubonic plague using ultrasound imaging.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBubonic plague, caused by Yersinia pestis, is characterised by painful, enlarged lymph nodes ("buboes"). Despite centuries of clinical recognition, bubo morphology has been described only through observation and palpation. This study aimed to characterise the sonographic features of buboes over time in confirmed bubonic plague and evaluate the validity of digital calliper measurements compared to ultrasound. METHODS/PRINCIPLE
findingsWe conducted a prospective cohort study at three rural health centres in Madagascar between January and March 2024. Participants with suspected bubonic plague underwent ultrasound imaging and digital calliper measurements of enlarged lymph nodes at inclusion (D1), and follow-up on D4 and D11. Bubo size and morphology were assessed by clinicians - who received targeted ultrasound training for the study - using portable ultrasound devices, with expert radiologist oversight. Neither clinicians or radiologists were blind to clinical information or outcomes. Final diagnoses were retrospectively assigned using WHO criteria and national laboratory results. Of 16 enrolled participants, 12 were confirmed plague cases. Most buboes exhibited normal morphology on D1, with limited change over time despite clinical improvement. No association was found between bubo size or morphology and clinical status. Digital calliper measurements differed substantially from ultrasound. Study sonographers achieved good agreement with radiologists on bubo size, but lower agreement on structural features. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Bubo morphology and size do not appear to correlate with clinical status, challenging their use as indicators of treatment response. Digital callipers introduce significant measurement error. Newly trained clinicians can perform size measurements reliably, but further training is needed for accurate sonographic characterisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.