ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Quality assessment of data for decentralised antiretroviral therapy referrals and laboratory results in the South African national electronic HIV management register TIER.Net.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indirect Effects of HIV Differentiated Service Delivery Programmes on Quality of Clinic Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Clients Starting Antiretroviral Therapy.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
- Trends in advanced HIV disease, treatment interruption, and viraemia in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three Interlinked Electronic Register (TIER.Net) is South Africa's national electronic HIV patient database, used to monitor antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery and laboratory results. However, few published evaluations have quantified TIER.Net data quality relative to national sources. We aimed to evaluate how well decentralised ART referral and laboratory result data are captured in TIER.Net. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing TIER.Net to national electronic health systems. For decentralised ART, we used de-identified data from 56 clinics in eThekwini (2020-2023) and compared the annual number of TIER.Net decentralised ART referrals to ART prescriptions in the Synchronised National Communication in Health (SyNCH) database. For laboratory data, we used de-identified records from 103 clinics in KwaZulu-Natal (2015-2022) and compared the annual number of TIER.Net viral load (VL) and CD4 tests with the number in National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS). The proportion of SyNCH decentralised ART prescriptions and NHLS VL and CD4 counts captured in TIER.Net were calculated by clinic, and trends were assessed using linear mixed-effects models (LMMs). The median proportion of SyNCH decentralised ART prescriptions captured in TIER.Net was 104.4% (IQR: 99.9-115.1%) in 2020 and 102.4% (IQR: 100.5-104.5%) in 2023. The LMM estimated an annual decrease of 2.8% (95% CI: -5.2;-0.5%). The median proportion of NHLS VLs captured in TIER.Net was 85.7% (IQR: 70.0-97.9%) in 2015 and 99.1% (IQR: 94.5-102.5%) in 2022. The LMM estimated an annual increase of 1.8% (95% CI: 1.2; 2.3%). The median proportion of NHLS CD4s captured in TIER.Net was 74.3% (IQR: 63.9-85.4%) in 2015 and 80.1% (IQR: 68.4-89.1%) in 2022. The LMM estimated no statistically significant trend over time (-0.09%, 95% CI: -0.9;0.7). Reassuringly, capture of TIER.Net for decentralised ART and VL data has improved to near 100%, but CD4 count capture remains sub-optimal, highlighting strengths and limitations of conducting analyses with this critical HIV programme database.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.