ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Evolutionary turnover of key amino acids explains conservation of function without conservation of sequence in transcriptional activation domains.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable biophysical neural networks of transcriptional activation domains separate roles of protein abundance and coactivator binding.Cell systems · 2026Article
- Sequence-based prediction of intermolecular interactions driven by disordered regions.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In folded protein domains, protein function is frequently more conserved than amino acid sequence because highly diverged sequences can fold into equivalent 3D structures with identical function. During evolution, intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs) often experience rapid amino acid sequence divergence, but because they do not fold into stable 3D structures, it remains largely unknown when and how function is conserved. As a model system for studying the evolution of IDRs, we examined transcriptional activation domains, the regions of transcription factors that bind to coactivator complexes. We systematically identified activation domains on 502 homologs of the transcriptional activator Gcn4 spanning 600 MY of fungal evolution in the Ascomycota. We found that the central activation domain shows strong conservation of function without conservation of sequence. This conservation of function without conservation of sequence arises from evolutionary turnover (gain and loss) at two length scales. Within the central activation domain, we see turnover of acidic and aromatic residues, but primarily loss of short linear motifs. In the full-length transcription factor, we see turnover of entire activation domains. Stabilizing selection and evolutionary turnover at multiple length scales are likely a general mechanism for conservation of function without conservation of sequence in IDRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.