ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Snakebite knowledge among healthcare workers in Gabon: A health facility-based cross-sectional survey.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSnakebite envenoming remains a neglected health issue in many countries, including Gabon, where the limited availability of snakebite-specific training, clinical guidelines, and essential resources at health facilities may lead to gaps in healthcare workers' knowledge and confidence and the use of non-recommended treatment practices. This study aimed to assess healthcare workers' knowledge of snakebite management in the Ogooué et des Lacs department of Moyen-Ogooué province in Gabon.
methodsFrom June to August 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional survey targeting all healthcare workers in Ogooué et des Lacs who may be involved in snakebite management. We collected information on prior training, self-perceived knowledge of snakebite management, symptom recognition, clinical management practices, and snake identification. Knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false symptom questions and 12 management questions, with one point assigned for each correct response. Generalised linear binomial regression modelling was used to evaluate associations between knowledge and participant characteristics.
resultsA total of 171 healthcare workers (78% of those eligible) participated. Overall, 40% (68/171) scored below 50% on symptom questions, and 66% (113/171) scored below 50% on management questions. Inappropriate practices were frequently recommended, including tourniquet use (70%, 120/171) and venom aspiration (73%, 125/171). Nurse assistants and nurses had a lower odds of correct responses than doctors (OR: 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.84, and OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98, respectively), while healthcare workers at secondary health facilities performed better than those at primary health facilities (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.46). Venomous snakes were correctly identified as such in 74% (109/148) of responses, compared with 28% (42/148) for non-venomous snakes.
conclusionGaps in snakebite knowledge and management were identified among healthcare workers in the study region. Targeted training, national clinical guidelines, and improved access to antivenom are needed to strengthen snakebite management in Ogooué et des Lacs and potentially more broadly in Gabon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.