Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluating hypothetical interventions effects on hospital-acquired infection outcomes with stacked probability visualization: R Shiny apps based on a multistate modelling approach.

Jean-Pierre Gnimatin, Marlon Grodd, Susanne Weber, Derek Hazard, Martin Wolkewitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jean-Pierre GnimatinInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-9683
Marlon GroddInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Susanne WeberInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-3836
Derek HazardInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin WolkewitzInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital-acquired infections (HAIs), contribute to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Evaluating intervention effects in dynamic clinical settings requires advanced modeling techniques. This study presents HAISim and StaViC, two interactive R Shiny apps designed to support decision-making in Infection Prevention and Control.

methodsA six-state extended illness-death multistate model was built with a time-constant transition hazard assumption. The multistate model maps patient trajectories involving healthcare-associated infections as an intermediate event, and mortality and discharge as absorbing events in order to describe the time-dependent dynamics within hospitals. Using two settings, we simulated the implementation of hypothetical treatments by modifying hazard rates: Setting 1 (improved treatment intervention only) and Setting 2 (combined enhanced treatment and infection prevention). These were used to create the interactive and user-friendly R Shiny Apps HAISim (HAIs Interventions Simulator) and StaViC (Stacked probAbility Visualization & Comparison). The Shiny Apps use inputs from literature or user data, such as transition-specific hazard rates and intervention-related parameters.

resultsHAISim models the effects of hypothetically improved treatment and infection prevention on outcomes such as the number of lives saved and the number of patient days decreased by simulating a hypothetical scenario based on actual clinical data. StaViC makes it possible to compare potential interventions and their impacts before and after implementation by visualizing the stacked probabilities of patients across various health conditions.

conclusionsThese tools bridge methodological rigor and practical implementation, offering hospitals a flexible framework to prioritize cost-effective IPC strategies.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionMobile ApplicationsComputer SimulationHumansProbability

Identifiers

PMID41838691
PMCPMC12991248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.