Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838686›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Decisions about risk taking: Elaborate dynamics between guests and hosts of peer-to-peer accommodation during COVID-19.

Anan Hu, Jinyuan Pang, Xuena Gan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anan HuDepartment of Tourism, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-9579
Jinyuan PangDepartment of Tourism, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xuena GanDepartment of Tourism, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1056-5973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the influence of COVID-19 on peer-to-peer accommodation, from perspectives of both market performance and guests' mindset. Combination of qualitative and quantitative data, as well as analysis by smaller time unit, enables more subtle insights into participants' behavior. Based on Event System Theory, authentic market data is examined to demonstrate the trend of demand and supply of Airbnb housing in New York City. Online reviews are investigated, using Structural Topic Model, to reveal how guests' focuses transformed. Results show that peer-to-peer accommodation was stricken heavily by COVID-19 and subsequent events, where booking volume shrank more severely, and reacted faster to exogenous environment, compared to housing supply. Guests shifted their attention after COVID-19 happened, caring more about hygiene and social distance. The synchronization of fluctuation among multiple variables validates the assumption that exogenous events successively influenced guests' attitude and market performance. Apropos of events, stronger incidents exhibited larger influence on market performance, and event timing affected exogenous events' influence upon the industry. This research enriches Event System Theory and adds to the insights into elaborate dynamics among participants of peer-to-peer accommodation industry during COVID-19. The findings provide hospitality practitioners and governments with reference for future risk management.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision MakingPeer GroupRisk-TakingHumansNew York CityPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41838686
PMCPMC12991232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.