ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Simultaneous serological assessment of four zoonotic rickettsiae among dogs near the United States-Mexico border.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simultaneous serological assessment of four zoonotic rickettsiae among dogs near the United States-Mexico border.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obligately intracellular rickettsiae cause a broad spectrum of disease in humans and animals, ranging from mild illness to life-threatening infections. Multiple species co-circulate along the southern United States of America-northern Mexico border, yet their seroprevalence in susceptible hosts remains incompletely understood. Dogs serve as key amplifying hosts for several of these pathogens, including Rickettsia rickettsii and Rickettsia massiliae, and have been shown to be infected by flea-borne Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis. To better characterize exposure and potential co-infection patterns, we conducted a large binational seroepidemiologic study of 779 dogs from urban households and shelter settings across seven subregions along both sides of the border. Using a custom multiplex micro-immunofluorescence assay, we simultaneously screened for antibodies to R. rickettsii, R. massiliae, R. typhi, and R. felis. Overall, 41.2% of dogs were seroreactive to at least one pathogen, with the highest seroprevalence for R. felis (19.3%), followed by R. massiliae (15.7%), R. typhi (14.5%), and R. rickettsii (9.8%). Co-seroreactivity was common, particularly between R. typhi and R. felis, with 34.2% of R. typhi-seroreactive samples also seroreactive to R. felis, and 16.7% exhibiting high titers to both. In contrast, R. rickettsii and R. massiliae showed limited overlap (15.2% co-seroreactive; 6.4% with high titers), suggesting possible cross-protection or competitive exclusion. Spatial analyses revealed distinct geographic patterns: R. massiliae predominated in western Baja California, R. rickettsii was concentrated in Mexicali and the Rio Grande Valley, and R. felis was widely distributed. Seroreactivity patterns were generally consistent across age and sex but varied modestly between shelter and neighborhood dogs, particularly for R. typhi. These findings highlight the complex ecology of rickettsial pathogens in a binational context, underscore the importance of dogs as sentinels for human risk, and provide a foundation for future studies on vector-host-pathogen interactions, cross-protective immunity, and spatial epidemiological risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.