ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue
Blood donation Word-of-Mouth behavior among Chinese and Indian donors: an exploration with Australian donors.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCultural diversity in a blood donor panel is vital for healthcare, especially in countries where multiple cultural groups are growing in representation and have unique phenotypes. Word-of-mouth (WOM) is considered a potentially powerful way to recruit diverse donors; however, donors seldom talk about blood donation. This study explores factors influencing positive WOM about blood donation among people within Chinese and Indian communities in Australia. MATERIALS AND
methodsSix online focus groups were conducted with 35 donors (20 Chinese and 15 Indian) aged 18-57 who had donated in the past 12 months. Using thematic analysis, the factors that contributed and inhibited sharing WOM about blood donation were identified. Participants shared their WOM experiences, motivations, perceived barriers, and supports needed to enhance their WOM activities.
resultsDonors from both cultural groups recognized the benefits of discussing blood donation, however their engagement varied. Most were reactive, responding to inquiries rather than initiating conversations. Their WOM behaviors were influenced by personal experiences, conversational context, and social connections. The main concern was being perceived as bragging, while motivators included altruism and professional links to healthcare. Significant cultural differences emerged: Indian participants were cautious about WOM to avoid personal health disclosures from recipients, while Chinese donors highlighted cultural perceptions of loss of vitality from donating, especially among older individuals, as a barrier to discussing donation. A proposed model of willingness to share WOM was developed based on individuals' goals for sharing WOM and perceived agency to do so. DISCUSSION: Strategies are needed to help donors view their role as including active support for blood donation. Tools and resources that give donors a "license" to initiate WOM discussions about blood donation, while addressing cultural misconceptions, may strengthen their confidence and agency to discuss blood donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.