ReviewEuropean geriatric medicine2026
A comparison of the national European guidelines: RSV vaccination in older adults.
Review in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination Strongly Induces RSVpreF-specific IgG and Neutralizing Activity in Immunocompromised Individuals.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated respiratory tract infections in older and frail adults should not be underestimated. As no treatment is available, two prefusion F vaccines and an mRNA-1345 vaccine have been approved by the EMA for patients ≥ 60 years. Several national European guidelines have been published recommending RSV vaccination in older persons. We aimed to analyse the differences between these recommendations and to review the underlying motivation for the proposed guidelines.
methodsA literature review was conducted. A summary of existing European recommendations was compiled, including those for older patients and vulnerable populations.
resultsFifteen governmental guidelines on RSV vaccination in older persons were identified. Ten guidelines advise vaccination for all adults ≥ 75 years old, while three countries recommend vaccination from ≥ 60 years old. Irish guidelines for those ≥ 65 years old. The Norwegian guidelines recommend vaccination only for individuals aged ≥ 60 years with underlying conditions. For individuals with risk factors, most countries advise vaccination at younger ages. Risk factors vary slightly between countries, but they can generally be categorized into chronic organ diseases, older age and frailty, immunosuppression and metabolic syndromes. We presume that vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety and cost-effectiveness are key considerations in the formulation of these different guidelines.
conclusionFifteen official governmental European guidelines were found on RSV vaccination, most of which recommend vaccination for the general population aged ≥ 75 years and at younger ages for at-risk individuals. There remains a need for more harmonized European guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41838383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.