ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Devising and Evaluating an Adaptive Static-Automated Perimetry Test for Children: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the feasibility of a Static Automated Perimetry in children test (cSAP) designed to return clinically useful information about a visual field when stopped after any number of presentations while testing the visual fields of children.
methodThe cSAP test was engineered with specific location selection, test logic and data presentation as the core of the perimetric procedure. Some strategies were added to engage children in the test such as fixation markers that changed shape and colour, splitting the test into 'levels' and a small visual and audio reward at the end of each level. The method was run dichoptically on the Topcon Tempo Perimeter using the Open Perimetry Interface. This is a report of a validation study on 10 adults with visual field loss, looking at the differences between the final estimated field and the fields reported after each presentation, as well as comparing to a simulated baseline procedure with the same test logic but random location selection. Additionally, the experience of using the method to test 11 children aged 4-9 years is also reported, with six being retested 3 months later.
resultsStopping cSAP after any number of presentations always gave a better estimate of the final field than the baseline method in the adult eyes, although four of the 10 differences were small. The youngest child, 4 years of age, had difficulty focussing on the test to get a useful field, but generally all other children engaged in the task and returned a sensible visual field result. There was an obvious learning effect across the re-tested younger children.
conclusioncSAP is a feasible method for testing children or others who may not complete a standard visual field test, with design advantages over conventional SAP tests for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.