Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838366›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2026

Sex Differences in Treatment Expectations, Satisfaction and Tolerance After Switching to CT-P17, an Adalimumab Biosimilar: A Post Hoc Analysis of the YU-MATTER Study.

Laure Gossec, Guillaume Bouguen, Azeddine Dellal, Lucile Foulley, Caroline Habauzit, Salim Benkhalifa, Hubert Marotte

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05427942 (YUflyma®), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05427942 unknown statusnot on this map

YUflyma® (Adalimumab), Patient Experience After Switching to adaliMumab biosimilAr High concenTration, Low Volume (40mg/0.4mL) (Yuflyma®) by Taking Patient pERception of Treatment Into Account: The YU-MATTER Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCelltrion HealthCare FranceRan2022 to 2023Enrolled300ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylarthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis Without Radiographic Evidence of Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic ArthritisArmsAdalimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laure GossecSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Team Pepites, 27 rue Chaligny, 75012, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-310X
Guillaume BouguenCHU Rennes, University of Rennes, INSERM, CIC1414, Institut NUMECAN, 2 rue Henri le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France.
Azeddine DellalDepartment of Rheumatology, GHI Le Raincy Montfermeil, 10 rue du Général Leclerc, 93370, Montfermeil, France.
Lucile FoulleyCelltrion Healthcare France, 9-15 rue Rouget de Lisle, 92130, Issy Les Moulineaux, France.
Caroline HabauzitCelltrion Healthcare France, 9-15 rue Rouget de Lisle, 92130, Issy Les Moulineaux, France. Caroline.Habauzit@celltrionhc.com.
Salim BenkhalifaCelltrion Healthcare France, 9-15 rue Rouget de Lisle, 92130, Issy Les Moulineaux, France.
Hubert MarotteUniversité Jean Monnet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Service de Rhumatologie, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, SAINBIOSE, 1059, Avenue Albert Raimond, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-9497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData suggest that women and men differ in how they experience biological treatment. This post hoc analysis of the YU-MATTER study evaluated sex-related differences in patient satisfaction and perception when switching from adalimumab (reference or biosimilar) to CT-P17 (Yuflyma

methodsThis analysis used data from the observational, multicentre, prospective YU-MATTER study. Patients had inflammatory bowel disease or chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease and switched from adalimumab (reference or low-concentration [< 50 mg/ml] biosimilar) to CT-P17. Patients completed online questionnaires monthly to month 3 (M3). The primary outcome was overall patient satisfaction (7-point Likert scale). Additional outcomes were expectations and perceptions of switching to CT-P17 (7- and 5-point Likert scale, respectively), beliefs about medicine (18-item Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), health literacy (16-item Health Literacy Survey Europe) and injection site reactions (pain and itching: 0-10 numerical rating scale; redness and haematoma: 4- and 3-point Likert scale, respectively).

resultsYU-MATTER enrolled 115 women and 117 men. More men than women reported satisfaction with CT-P17 treatment at M3 (82.1% vs 68.7%). Beliefs about medicines, health literacy, and patient expectations and perceptions of CT-P17 treatment did not differ significantly between sexes, although more women expected CT-P17 to be less painful (73.0% vs 59.0%; p = 0.077). At baseline, women reported significantly higher incidences of injection site redness (60.9% vs 48.7%) and haematoma (50.4% vs 26.5%) than men, with similar trends at M3 (40.0% vs 20.2% and 32.6% vs 8.5%, respectively), as well as significantly higher severity of injection site pain and itching. Both sexes reported fewer and less severe injection site reactions with CT-P17 at M3 compared with baseline adalimumab.

conclusionMost expectations and perceptions of CT-P17 treatment were similar between sexes, but women experienced more injection site reactions. Further research is needed to understand why women experience a higher incidence of these reactions with adalimumab and its biosimilars.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05427942 (registered June 22, 2022).

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdverse eventsBiosimilarCT-P17Injection site reactionsPatient-reported outcomesSex differencesTolerance

Identifiers

PMID41838366
PMCPMC13198574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.