ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Real-World Outcomes for Patients with Clinically Node-Positive Melanoma Undergoing Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Nodal Dissection.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effective tumor kinetics inferred from single routine H&E biopsies enable counterfactual virtual radiotherapy trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIO) followed by a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) for patients with clinically node-positive melanoma is supported by level 1 evidence. Our aim was to assess the association of pathologic response (PR) and nIO regimen with survival among patients with clinical stage III melanoma undergoing nIO and TLND.
methodsOur study included patients treated with nIO followed by a TLND from a large academic institution between 2016 and 2024. The pathologic response was assessed using established guidelines. Differences in extent of PR by nIO regimen were examined. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) by PR and nIO regimen were assessed.
resultsThe study included 121 patients (78.5% treated with combination nIO; 21.5% treated with single-agent anti-PD-1). The pCR rate was 64.2% for combination therapy and 53.8% for monotherapy (P=0.11). In univariable analysis, patients who received combination therapy had a 2-year DFS similar to patients treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 (86.5% vs 85.1%, respectively; P=0.43). Patients with a pCR had a 2-year DFS of 94.4% versus 57.3% among those with pathologic non-response (pNR) (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, PR was associated with DFS, but the nIO regimen was not. Our findings showed similar results for OS, with a 2-year OS of 98.1% for patients with pCR compared with 94.7% for those with pNR (P=0.01).
conclusionsConsistent with clinical trial data, the findings in this study support PR as a strong predictor of survival in this patient population. Studies investigating the de-escalation of surgical and systemic treatment based on PR as well as biomarkers of patients who can achieve a pCR after monotherapy alone are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.