Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838262›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Deep learning-based identification of chronic pulmonary embolism on CTPA: a regional lung analysis using multiplanar MIP images.

Tuomas Vainio, Teemu Mäkelä, Arttu Ruohola, Anssi Arkko, Sauli Savolainen, Marko Kangasniemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tuomas VainioHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. tuomas.vainio@hus.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-0084
Teemu MäkeläHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Arttu RuoholaHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anssi ArkkoHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sauli SavolainenHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko KangasniemiHUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri M780025014Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri TYH2024228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChronic pulmonary embolism (CPE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are challenging to diagnose, with delayed detection increasing mortality. We evaluated the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in identifying these conditions from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-derived maximum intensity projection (MIP) images using a novel approach including proximal pulmonary vessels and a layered segmentation of the lung volume to assess the diagnostic value of different vascular regions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 41 CPE, 41 acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and 41 normal controls (non-PE). 25 of the CPE patients had CTEPH confirmed by right heart catheterization. CNN classifiers were trained to identify CPE or CTEPH against a combined APE and non-PE group. Eleven masking schemes were applied for both classification tasks, resulting in 22 experiments. Model performances were compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC).

resultsThe model achieved good performance in distinguishing CPE from non-PE and APE cases (cross-validation AUROC 0.80) using full lung volume MIPs, while performance decreased with reduced data. For CTEPH classification against non-PE and APE, the model reached AUROC 0.88 with full data and 0.86 using only the most proximal half of the lung volume, suggesting key diagnostic features reside centrally. Using an open-source segmentation model, which excludes proximal vessels, resulted in lower AUROCs (0.74 for CPE, 0.83 for CTEPH).

conclusionThe cross-validation indicated that CPE and CTEPH could be identified from CTPA-derived MIP images, with performance improving as more vessels were included. The proximal vessels were most relevant for CTEPH detection. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study shows that neural networks can identify chronic pulmonary embolism in CTPA and the role of different vascular regions in that task, with the potential to improve future imaging diagnostics in patients with chronic pulmonary embolism. KEY POINTS: A convolutional neural network detects chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and chronic embolism from CTPA MIP projections. CTPA data were divided into four concentric anatomic layers for regional analysis. Central layers were most important for identifying CTEPH features. Network performance improved when more vessel regions were used as input.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyDeep LearningPulmonary EmbolismAgedChronic DiseaseConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedDeep learningHypertension (pulmonary)Lung volume measurementsPulmonary embolismTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID41838262
PMCPMC12992889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.