ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
Socio-economic impact of bovine brucellosis and the need for effective control strategies.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brucellosis in the One Health Context: Gaps in Diagnosis, Control, and Global Epidemiology.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Review
- From Reactive to Predictive One Health: AI-Enabled Frameworks for Integrated Zoonotic Surveillance and Governance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Development of a dual fluorescent microsphere-based lateral flow immunoassays for simultaneous detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease that significantly affects livestock-dependent countries with limited resources. Despite its impact, few studies have comprehensively examined its socio-economic consequences. The extent of these impacts varies by region, production systems, available resources, and the disease’s indirect health effects on humans. This review analyzed published studies to examine reported economic losses, risk factors, and protective measures, with the aim of informing control strategies. Prevalence of bovine brucellosis ranged widely, from 1.88 to 77.5% at the individual animal level and 1.9–26.3% at the herd level, with ELISA as the most common diagnostic tool. Identified risk factors included herd size, breed, age, abortion history, and mixed-animal farming. In contrast, vaccination, effective management, veterinary support, and farmers’ knowledge acted as protective elements. Economic loss estimates remain limited but suggest that brucellosis costs livestock sectors millions of dollars annually in affected regions. Such losses result from reduced productivity, reproductive failure, and market restrictions. Controlling brucellosis, therefore, holds critical importance for safeguarding farmers’ incomes and national economies. Understanding disease transmission pathways alongside farmers’ profit margins is essential to designing sustainable interventions. Evidence from episodic studies highlights that mass vaccination programs are cost-effective and yield significant benefits when evaluated from a societal perspective, encompassing both human and animal health. Hence, coordinated, well-informed control strategies are urgently needed to improve livestock productivity, protect public health, and ensure farmers’ economic stability while effectively addressing brucellosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41838255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.