ArticleOecologia2026
Species diversity and competition influence nitrogen resorption efficiency in mixed hardwood plantations.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutrient dynamics substantially influences forest productivity, yet the influence of competition on these processes in forests is not well understood. Nitrogen is an important limiting nutrient for tree growth, but how canopy nitrogen dynamics are influenced by tree diversity and competition is unclear. Nitrogen-use efficiency is one mechanism suggested to support niche complementarity, promoting increased productivity as diversity increases, and is influenced by the resorption of foliar nutrients during senescence. We tested how diversity and competition affect canopy nitrogen dynamics by examining nitrogen resorption efficiency (NRE) in over 200 trees from three tree species in a 12-year-old mixed-species hardwood planting that included a full-factorial design of three levels of species diversity, representing intra- and interspecific competition, and two levels of planting density, representing competition intensity. Midseason and senescent foliar samples were collected from black cherry (Prunus serotina), American chestnut (Castanea dentata), and northern red oak (Quercus rubra) and we determined midseason canopy and foliar litter nitrogen concentrations and calculated NRE. Higher midseason canopy nitrogen concentrations were observed in more diverse, low-density plantings, but the response magnitude varied among species. NRE increased as diversity increased; the response, however, varied among species, ranging from a statistically significant increase to no response, but was not influenced by planting density. These findings provide evidence that while the influence of diversity on tree physiological responses depends on the type of competitive interaction (i.e., diversity or intensity), different combinations of species will likely affect processes related with niche complementarity and, ultimately, a positive biodiversity-productivity relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.