ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Redo TEP in recurrent inguinal hernia After TEP/TAPP: Outcomes and feasibility.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia following previous laparoendoscopic repair lacks robust scientific evidence and varies across guidelines. Due to a paucity of data, the European Hernia Society currently recommends open anterior repair for the management of recurrent inguinal hernias after a previous laparoendoscopic repair, based solely on expert opinion. However, repeat endoscopic repair can yield favorable outcomes in experienced hands. This study aimed to compare patient outcomes between repeat endoscopic repair (ReTEP) and the Lichtenstein technique for recurrent hernias after initial TAPP or TEP.
methodsAdult patients undergoing surgery for first recurrence after laparoendoscopic repair were included. Intra- and postoperative morbidity was analyzed retrospectively, and symptoms and quality of life were assessed prospectively using clinical and ultrasound examination, the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), and the COMI (Core Outcome Measurement Index)-Hernia questionnaire.
resultsBetween January 2012 and March 2020, the center performed 48 ReTEPs and 45 Lichtenstein hernioplasties for the first recurrence of inguinal hernia after primary endoscopic surgery. Both groups were generally comparable in terms of age, BMI and intrinsic perioperative risk factors. The rate of conversion from ReTEP to Lichtenstein procedure was 27,3%, remained consistent over the years and showed no correlation with surgeon’s expertise. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency and severity of complications between ReTEP and Lichtenstein. The Lichtenstein procedure was significantly superior in the categories “foreign body sensation” and “pain” assessed using the CCS and the second recurrencies were more frequently observed after ReTEP.
conclusionThe findings support the expert suggestion of HerniaSurge group regarding the change of procedure for managing recurrent inguinal hernia following initial endoscopic surgery. In this case the Lichtenstein operation should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.