Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838158›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

The possible effect of forceful eye closure and eye opening on nasal valve cross-sectional area during endoscopy.

Alisa Luria, Keren Oren, Yehuda Schwarz, Oded Cohen, Ofer Gluck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alisa LuriaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University, 7, Ha'Refua Street, 7747629, Ashdod, Israel.
Keren OrenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University, 7, Ha'Refua Street, 7747629, Ashdod, Israel. keren.oren@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2968-1279
Yehuda SchwarzDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University, 7, Ha'Refua Street, 7747629, Ashdod, Israel.
Oded CohenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University, 7, Ha'Refua Street, 7747629, Ashdod, Israel.
Ofer GluckDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben Gurion University, 7, Ha'Refua Street, 7747629, Ashdod, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNasal endoscopy is a routine procedure in the otolaryngology clinic, yet intra-procedural discomfort is common and may deter future examinations. Preliminary observations suggest that eye closure may affect the nasal valve cross-sectional area, which, in turn, has the potential to impact discomfort during endoscopy, as it is the narrowest part of the nasal passageway.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of forceful eye opening and closure on the nasal valve’s cross-sectional area using rigid video-endoscopy and digital image analysis.

methodsA prospective pilot case series study. Nasal video endoscopy of the right nasal vestibule was performed by a rigid endoscope in 3 facial positions: relaxed, eyes tightly closed, and eyes wide open. Nasal valve images were assessed by two independent, blinded examiners, who quantified the nasal valve cross-sectional area. The area size in the “relaxed” position was used as a reference against which the area sizes in other facial positions were normalized.

resultsThe study included 36 volunteers, of which 27 were females (75%). The mean age was 40.7 ± 12.7 years. The nasal valve cross-sectional area was significantly smaller at the “eyes tightly closed” position, compared with the “relaxed” position (Z = -5.232, p-value < 0.001) and with the “eyes wide open” position (Z = -5.169, p-value < 0.001). No significant difference was found between the “relaxed” and “eyes wide open” positions.

conclusionThis hypothesis-generating pilot study demonstrated that tight eye closure is associated with a significant decrease in the cross-sectional area of the nasal valve. Considering the possible relation between a narrow passage and discomfort, further studies investigating the association between eye closure and patients’ discomfort during endoscopy are encouraged.

Indexed as

EndoscopyNasal CavityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesVideo RecordingEndoscopic techniqueEye closureNasal endoscopyNasal valvePatient comfort

Identifiers

PMID41838158
PMCPMC13152924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.