Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838139›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Auditory processing abilities in daily motorbike riders.

G M Srujan, Sathish Kumar, Arivudai Nambi Pitchai Muthu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G M SrujanManipal Academy of Higher Education, Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal, India.
Sathish KumarManipal Academy of Higher Education, Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal, India.
Arivudai Nambi Pitchai MuthuManipal Academy of Higher Education, Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal, India. arivudainambi@aiishmysore.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-5334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe negative auditory effects of wind noise exposure among motorcyclists are well-documented in the literature. The current study aimed to investigate functional auditory abilities, including auditory acuity and suprathreshold auditory abilities in young motorcyclists.

methodThirty-two young adults (non-riders: 15, riders: 17), aged between 18 and 30 years, underwent comprehensive auditory assessments including structured interviews, conventional and high-frequency audiometry, Speech In Noise test (SNR50), Modulation Discrimination Test in Noise (MDT-N), and Temporal Fine Structure - Adaptive Frequency (TFS-AF), and noise level estimation.

resultsStatistical analysis revealed no significant difference between riders and non-riders groups in hearing thresholds, SNR50, and MDT-N tests. However, the TFS-AF test showed that the riders group had significantly poorer scores compared to the non-riders group.

conclusionThe study findings suggest that exposure to wind noise may impair the temporal fine structure processing, even when hearing thresholds are within normal limits. Such suprathreshold deficits are consistent with the functional profile of cochlear synaptopathy (CS), though behavioural measures alone cannot confirm synaptic pathology. Future research should incorporate a comprehensive battery of complementary measures, such as electrophysiological assessments, to substantiate the presence of CS in this population.

Indexed as

Auditory AcuityAuditory PerceptionNoiseAdolescentAdultAudiometryAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleWindYoung AdultHearing impairmentMotorcyclistsNoise exposureNoise-induced hearing loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.