ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Visuomotor information drives interference between the hands more than dynamic motor information during bimanual reaching.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of aging on the visuomotor control during continuous bimanual movement.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During complex bimanual movements, interference can occur in the form of one hand influencing the action of the contralateral hand. Interference likely results from conflicting sensorimotor information shared between brain regions controlling hand movements via neural crosstalk. However, how visual and force-related feedback processes interact with each other during bimanual reaching is not well understood. In this study, four groups experienced either a visuomotor perturbation, dynamic perturbation, combined visuomotor and dynamic perturbation, or no perturbation in their right hand during bimanual reaches, with each hand controlling its own cursor. The left hand was examined for interference as a consequence of the right-hand perturbation. The results indicated that the visuomotor and combined perturbations showed greater interference in the left hand than the dynamic perturbation. However, the combined perturbation did not show greater interference than the visuomotor perturbation. This suggests that dynamic sensorimotor and visuomotor processes do not interact between hemisphere-hand systems, and that primarily visuomotor processes lead to interference between the hands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.