Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838003›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Resident Physician Walkout and High-Incidence Cancer Operation Volumes in South Korea.

Chanseok Son, Jaehun Jung, Hyejin Joo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chanseok SonDepartment of Public Health, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaehun JungDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyejin JooDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Resident physicians constitute a small proportion of South Korea's physician workforce overall but nearly one-third of staff at tertiary hospitals, where they provide essential frontline care. Their absence may jeopardize access to time-sensitive treatments, such as cancer operations. Objectives: To assess the association of the 2024 resident physician walkout in South Korea with operation volumes for 6 common cancers and evaluate whether general hospitals absorbed displaced cases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study with an interrupted time-series analysis used segmented regression of monthly claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2024, representing nationwide inpatient surgical volumes. All tertiary and general hospitals in South Korea that submitted operation claims for colorectal, gastric, liver, lung, breast, and thyroid cancer identified using diagnosis and procedure codes were included. Exposure: Mass resignation of more than 10 000 resident physicians beginning in February 2024. The intervention point was March 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly operative claims for each cancer type, stratified by hospital level. Negative binomial regression estimated immediate (level) and slope changes. Results: This study analyzed 652 681 claims for operations for 6 high-incidence cancers over the 6-year study period, representing nationwide inpatient surgical volumes. Among these claims, tertiary hospitals showed immediate decreases for colorectal (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P < .001), gastric (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < .001), lung (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.61-0.76; P < .001), breast (IRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88; P < .001), and thyroid cancer (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.60-0.77; P < .001) operations, but not liver cancer (IRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.01; P = .08). General hospitals showed increases for gastric (IRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.52; P < .001), lung (IRR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.17-1.49; P < .001), and breast cancer (IRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.57; P < .001) operations. General hospitals absorbed approximately 58% of breast cancer operations but only 16% to 25% of colorectal, gastric, and lung cancer operations, resulting in a net nationwide decrease. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study with an interrupted time-series analysis of national claims data, the 2024 resident physician walkout in South Korea was associated with substantial reductions in cancer operations at tertiary hospitals, which were only partially compensated by general hospitals. These findings highlight the structural vulnerability of South Korea's health care system, arising from an overreliance on resident physicians.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyNeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansIncidenceInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleRepublic of KoreaTertiary Care Centers

Identifiers

PMID41838003
PMCPMC12993696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.