Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837841›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Self-association enhances early attentional selection through automatic prioritization of socially salient signals.

Meike Scheller, Jan Tünnermann, Katja Fredriksson, Huilin Fang, Jie Sui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meike SchellerUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3021-5614
Jan TünnermannPhilipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Katja FredrikssonUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Huilin FangUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Jie SuiUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust REF RPG-2019-010University of Aberdeen CF10831-27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficiently processing self-related information is critical for cognition, yet the earliest mechanisms enabling this self-prioritization in humans remain unclear. By combining a temporal order judgement task with computational modeling based on the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA), we show how mere, arbitrary associations with the self can fundamentally alter attentional selection of sensory information into aware short-term memory, by enhancing the attentional weights and processing capacity devoted to encoding socially loaded information. This self-prioritization in attentional selection occurs automatically at early perceptual stages but reduces when active social decoding is required. Importantly, the processing benefits obtained from attentional selection via self-relatedness and via physical salience were additive, suggesting that social and perceptual salience captured attention via separate mechanisms. Furthermore, intra-individual correlations revealed an 'obligatory' self-prioritization effect, whereby self-relatedness overpowered the contribution of perceptual salience in guiding attentional selection. Together, our findings provide evidence for the influence of self-relatedness during earlier, automatic stages of attentional selection at the gateway to perception, distinct from later post-attentive processing stages.

Indexed as

AttentionAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adultattentional selectioncomputational biologyhumanneuroscienceselfsocial cognitionsocial saliencesystems biologytheory of visual attention

Identifiers

PMID41837841
PMCPMC12991649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.