ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Surgical Problems and Postoperative Morbidity in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.
Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMandibular third molar (MTM) extractions are among the most frequent oral surgical procedures, often associated with variable surgical difficulty and postoperative complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential in predicting these outcomes to enhance preoperative planning. This study was done to evaluate the utility of AI in predicting surgical difficulty and postoperative morbidity in MTM extractions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data and patient variables. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study of 40 patients undergoing MTM extraction was conducted. AI algorithms (random forest and convolutional neural networks) analyzed CBCT features and clinical parameters to predict difficulty and morbidity. Statistical evaluation was done using SPSS version 26.
resultsThe AI model demonstrated an overall accuracy of 87.5% in predicting surgical difficulty and 82.3% for postoperative morbidity. Significant predictors included root morphology, proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve, and patient age ( P < 0.05).
conclusionAI-based models can effectively predict MTM extraction difficulty and postoperative morbidity, facilitating personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.