ArticleJournal of intensive care medicine2026
Machine Learning in the ICU: Predicting Mortality in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections.
Article in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06167083 (Machine Learning in the ICU), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Machine Learning in the ICU: Predicting Mortality in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resistance phenotype, infection source, and empirical therapy in ICU-onset gram-negative bloodstream infections: Associations with 30-day mortality.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- A nomogram for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Development and internal-external validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for multidrug resistance in mechanically ventilated ICU patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and ObjectiveMultidrug and carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections cause high mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Predicting mortality can improve treatment and support end-of-life decisions. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict mortality in ICU patients with these infections.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care medical center between 2017 and 2023. Adult ICU patients with bloodstream infections caused by multidrug and carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii were included. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used to compare the groups. Multivariable analysis with binary logistic regression was used to identify mortality risk factors. Ten machine learning classifiers were evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and model predictions were interpreted with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).Results197 patients were included, with a 15-day mortality rate of 48%. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) classifier showed the best performance, with an AUROC of 0.94, AUPRC of 0.952, accuracy of 0.868, precision of 0.906, recall of 0.822, F1 score of 0.855, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.744, and Brier score of 0.131. SHAP analysis revealed coagulopathy, rapid access to antibiotics, septic shock, SOFA score, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and time-related parameters as the most important predictive features.ConclusionThe LightGBM model showed promising results in predicting mortality in ICU patients. This model may support early intervention and assist in complex end-of-life decisions. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06167083).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.