ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Unveiling discrepancies in depression detection among persons with dementia: A comparative analysis of caregiver and self-report.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundDepression assessment in persons with dementia (PWD) often prioritizes caregiver report, with limited integration of self-report due to concerns about PWD insight.ObjectiveThis cross-sectional study examined discrepancies between self- and caregiver-reported depression in PWD and identified neuropsychiatric and diagnostic predictors of discordance.Methods402 PWD diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) self-reported depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), while caregivers completed the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Discrepancies were categorized as Concordant (agreement), Discordant Type 1 (self-reported depression denied by caregiver), or Discordant Type 2 (caregiver-reported depression denied by PWD).ResultsOne-third (33.8%) of dyads showed discrepancies: 66.2% were concordant, 10.2% Discordant Type 1, and 23.6% Discordant Type 2. PSPs had higher incidence of Type 1 discordance compared to AD (OR = 2.91, p < 0.05), while svPPAs were less likely to incur Type 2 discordance than AD (OR = 0.33, p < 0.01). Higher self-reported GDS Hopelessness, Withdrawal, and Worry predicted higher rates of Type 1 discordance, while lower Dysphoria predicted Type 2 discordance. Higher caregiver-reported NPI Apathy increased odds of Type 1 discordance (OR = 2.46, p < 0.05) and lower NPI Anxiety increased odds of Type 2 discordance (OR = 0.50, p < 0.01). Among cases with Type 1 discordance, caregivers often endorsed PWD apathy, irritability, agitation, or anxiety instead of depression.ConclusionsDiscrepancies in reporting depression in PWD can reflect underreporting by caregivers, not only denial by PWD. Integrating self-report, caregiver input, and clinical judgment may improve diagnostic accuracy for depression in PWD and improve care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.