Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837717›Full record

SynthesisCritical care medicine2026

Inhaled Antibiotics to Treat Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shan Lyu, Jian Luo, Ping Liu, Xiaojing Qin, Wanjia He, Guoqiang Jing, Stephan Ehrmann, Jie Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shan LyuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4219-2920
Jian LuoRespiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, NDM Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ping LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaojing QinDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
Wanjia HeDivision of Community Medicine and Public Health Practice, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Guoqiang JingDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Bingzhou, China.
Stephan EhrmannCHRU Tours, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CIC INSERM 1415, CRICS-TriggerSep F-CRIN research network, Tours, France.
Jie LiDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0003-0121-1291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the effects of adjunctive inhaled antibiotics in treating ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 31, 2025. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies comparing adjunctive inhaled antibiotics with placebo/blank or IV antibiotics for VAP treatment. DATA EXTRACTION: Two groups independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Analyses used random effects models. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, trial sequential analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 32 RCTs in the primary analysis and 41 non-RCTs in sensitivity analysis. Compared with placebo/blank, inhaled antibiotics significantly improved clinical cure (16 RCTs; n = 1425; risk ratio [RR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.43) and reduced all-cause mortality (21 RCTs; n = 1855; RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98), with consistent findings in sensitivity analyses including non-RCTs. These benefits were significant in VAP-only patients (clinical cure: 11 RCTs; n = 775; RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.10-1.52 and all-cause mortality: 15 RCTs; n = 1152; RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90), but not in studies including mixed pneumonia populations. Meta-regression confirmed VAP-only population as a significant effect modifier. Inhaled antibiotics also improved microbiological eradication (20 RCTs; n = 1805; RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.58) and reduced emergence of new drug resistance (four RCTs; n = 182; RR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.64). No differences were found in ICU length of stay, ventilator duration, or other adverse events. Compared with IV antibiotics, inhaled antibiotics shortened ventilator duration (three RCTs; n = 322; mean difference, -2.11 d; 95% CI, -3.73 to -0.49 d), and reduced nephrotoxicity (three RCTs; n = 292; RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.68).

conclusionsCompared with placebo/blank, adjunctive inhaled antibiotics improve clinical cure and microbiological eradication, and may reduce mortality, particularly in VAP-only patients. Exploratory analyses based on limited data suggest potential advantages over IV therapy, including shorter ventilator duration and lower nephrotoxicity, warranting further high-quality trials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedAdministration, InhalationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agentsaerosol drug therapyinhaled antibioticsmeta-analysistreatmentventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.