ArticleDiabetes care2026
Improving the Algorithm: The Inclusion of a Socioeconomic Status Measure in Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Development in Youth With Prediabetes.
Article in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) contributes to predicting type 2 diabetes development in youth with prediabetes compared with a machine learning (ML) model built with other data elements. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsPatient encounters (n = 665) from an electronic medical record were used to build supervised ML models to predict type 2 diabetes development within 1 year of prediabetes diagnosis. The ADI was constructed using patients' census block data. Two models, trained on data with and without ADI, were built. The model selection resulted in logistic regressions with 1) HbA1c only and 2) HbA1c + ADI as the best models from each data set.
resultsA total of 181 patient encounters (27.2%) developed type 2 diabetes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the HbA1c-only model was 0.68 and of the HbA1c + ADI model, 0.73.
conclusionsThe addition of ADI to the model resulted in the best performance in predicting youth-onset type 2 diabetes development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.